# The Benefits of Effective Collateral

# Management in Cleared Derivatives

**Tucker Dona**  
Head of Business  
Development and  
Client Success

**Ragu Raymond**  
Director of Business  
Development and  
Client Success

**The effective management and deployment of assets has always been an**  
**important factor in the performance of Futures Commission Merchants**  
**(FCMs). However, until now it’s not been possible to achieve consolidated**  
**connectivity to multiple central clearing counterparties (CCPs) to enable FCMs**  
**to access real-time collateral and margin data – invaluable insight that can be**  
**used to optimise and instruct collateral movements across CCPs globally.**

## Collateral Management in Cleared Derivatives: An Area Ripe for Disruption

Market volatility resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic fuelled trading activity  
and led to a rise in margin requirements from CCPs – in some cases by more  	han 100%. Whilst recent activity has been more subdued, the backwardlooking risk models deployed by CCPs mean that high margin requirements  
remain in place. This in turn, has led to increased pressure on FCMs to manage  
collateral effectively, maximise liquidity, and reduce risk.

Within FCMs, the function of collateral management involves multiple manual  
processes. Each CCP produces end-of-day reports in different formats and  
communicates with FCMs via its own dedicated channels. Very few firms have  
reliable access to the intraday data that can prove critically important in fast  
moving markets.

Added to this is the need for FCMs to monitor collateral and assess risk,  
optimise margin in line with tight CCP cut-off times, and check eligibility  
of collateral with multiple CCPs. While an FCM can to some extent reduce  
workload by setting its own criteria on the types and volumes of collateral  
it will accept from its customers, in practice a client may only have certain  
collateral to pledge. “And if an FCM won’t accept it, the client will look to go  
elsewhere,” explains Ragu Raymond, Director of Business Development and  
Client Success at Baton Systems. “So a lot of FCMs collect collateral but can’t  
do anything with it. They’re reducing risk, but not maximising liquidity.”

“Another issue is time zones,” Raymond says. “It can take up to three days  
to move collateral from EMEA to APAC, and this can prevent firms from  
responding to margin calls in a timely and efficient manner.”

“**The automation of these**  
**processes reduces costs,**  
**increases**  
**capacity and**  
**workflow**  
**efficiency and**  
**has a positive**  
**impact on the**  
**firm’s overall**  
**liquidity profile.”**

Every transfer of collateral therefore requires significant operational input.  
This limits the number of transactions which can be performed and further  
reduces efficiency.

## Technology is the Key

Respondents to a Futures Industry Association survey¹ conducted Q1 2021  
cited collateral management as an area where technological innovation and  
modernisation is needed. There is a growing need for technology which can  
provide a single, comprehensive and accurate view of exposures and obligations.

“Baton’s platform sits between the FCMs and the CCPs,” explains Tucker Dona,  
Baton’s Head of Business Development and Client Success. “The technology  
eliminates many of the existing manual working methods which impede FCM  
decision making, by providing real-time visibility of collateral, along with excess/  
deficit calculations and eligibility rules, haircuts and the risk thresholds for  
individual CCPs.

“**The automation of these processes reduces costs, increases capacity and**  
**workflow efficiency and has a positive impact on the firm’s overall liquidity profile.”**

Reducing the reliance of an FCM on manual processes and checks allows  
optimal decisions to be made about the movement of assets, resulting in  
significant economic benefits for the firm. Using Baton’s technology, an FCM  
can implement automated rules and alerts to move specific, eligible collateral  
to and from CCPs based on intraday data, meaning that the excess collateral  
maintained by a firm at any given CCP can be reduced. In addition, Baton allows  
an FCM to monitor the efficiency of existing collateral placements – for example,  
by factoring in haircut changes or interest rates – thereby optimising the  
decision-making process regarding placement of collateral.

Further, by automating the onward processing of collateral and tracking its  
location in real time, an FCM is able to efficiently utilise all available client  
collateral in custody, leading to improvements in funding and liquidity.

¹FIA Industry Sentiment Survey Q1 2021,  
<u>www.fia.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/IndustrySentimentSurvey_Q1-2021%20Highlights.pdf</u>

## Looking to the Future

Baton is focusing heavily on building out CCP connectivity. “We don’t require  
much work from the CCPs,” Dona stresses. “I believe the CCPs are coming to  
realise the value of having one consolidated source of instructions. It means  
there are fewer problems for them to solve.”

Going forward, Dona is keen to explore the use of Baton’s technology in the  
connectivity between FCMs and their clients. By using Baton’s technology across  
multiple FCMs, clients and FCMs can replace existing email processes and have  
a better real-time view of the status of pledges and recalls. For Baton’s FCM  
clients, this will also reduce the manual processing role of the FCM and ensure  
that assets are moved in a timely and efficient manner.

## Empowering Trading

It is clear that, with multiple legacy systems and manual processes in place, it  
is becoming increasingly difficult for FCMs to maintain control of collateral and  
manage risk. The inability to act swiftly and the constraints of working with CCPs  
across multiple time zones consistently leads to delays, missed opportunities  
and trading inefficiencies.

Whilst some firms remain reluctant to replace existing systems, citing risk and  
cost as potential barriers, Ragu Raymond is adamant that existing collateral  
management infrastructures are hampering growth.

“At Baton, we can’t dictate strategy to an FCM,” Raymond says. “But we can  
educate them about the benefits of streamlining processes and gaining real-time  
insight that can be used to optimise decision-making and collateral placement.”

“If everyone becomes more efficient,” he adds, “it would release idle collateral so it  
can be more effectively deployed – which can only be a good thing for individual  
firms and the industry as a whole.”

## About Baton Systems

**Founded in 2016 by technology, payments and capital markets veterans,**  
**and backed by venture capital, Baton Systems is reforming how payments**  
**are made in the world’s largest financial markets.**

By delivering on-demand synchronisation and orchestration of asset movements  
through its distributed ledger-based platform, Baton is eliminating friction to  
speed clearing and settlement, reducing risk and pre-funding requirements, and  
increasing liquidity.
